PepsiCo: Sum Of Us Doritos palm oil attack is ‘patently false’

By Kacey Culliney contact

- Last updated on GMT

Sum Of Us' spoof ad features a love story centered around Doritos, ending in a shock discovery that the brand destroys forests during production - an ad PepsiCo has coined a 'public relations stunt'
Sum Of Us' spoof ad features a love story centered around Doritos, ending in a shock discovery that the brand destroys forests during production - an ad PepsiCo has coined a 'public relations stunt'

Related tags: Palm oil, Snack food, Frito-lay, Pepsico

PepsiCo has slammed a campaign from Sum Of Us against its Doritos brand that suggests the chips contain unsustainable palm oil.

Consumer activist group Sum Of Us launched a campaign against the Frito-Lay Doritos brand in December and recently published a spoof advert suggesting Doritos contained unsustainable palm oil sourced through deforestation.

The online ad ‘Love at first bite – The ad Doritos don’t want you to see’ contains the statement ‘Doritos – may contain traces of rainforest’ and has been made public to coincide with PepsiCo’s annual Doritos Super Bowl campaign.

However, PepsiCo has refuted the campaign. A spokesperson told this site: “It is no surprise that Sum Of Us’ continual mischaracterizations of our palm oil commitments are patently false and run counter to the positive reception our policies have received from expert organizations in this arena.

“…This latest public relations stunt, focused on fiction rather than facts, does nothing to foster positive dialogue or affect positive change. We find our policies effective and stand by them.”

Sum of Us seeks palm oil policy change

Hanna Thomas, senior campaigner at Sum Of Us, said the organization's campaign against Doritos was part of a long-running effort with Rainforest Action Network (RAN) to push PepsiCo to change its current palm oil policy.

“We hope that PepsiCo will take a look over their policies and the current gaps, and make the decision to be a leader in their industry. It’s no good to just do the bare minimum. PepsiCo is such a large company with such a huge amount of purchasing power, they should be out in front and taking the impacts of the snack food industry seriously,”​ she told BakeryandSnacks.com.

She said the push against PepsiCo was based on RAN’s ‘Snack Food 20’ report, published in 2013​, which suggested the company, along with 19 other snack firms, had inadequate palm oil policies. 

PepsioCo's palm oil policy

However, PepsiCo fought back, stating the company had repeatedly said it was committed to using 100% Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) certified palm oil by 2015 and ensuring zero deforestation in its activities and sourcing.

In May last year, PepsiCo said it would tighten palm oil supply controls further by 2016 to ensure all suppliers were RSPO members and complied with PepsiCo’s Forestry Stewardship Policy which focused on stopping further development on High Carbon Stock (HCS) and High Conservation Value (HCV) forests.

It said it was committed to realizing zero deforestation in company-owned and –operated activities throughout its supply chain by 2020. The company's full palm oil commitments can be found HERE​.

Sum Of Us called on PepsiCo to consider High Conservation Areas, not just forests. Photo Credit: WWF
Sum Of Us called on PepsiCo to consider High Conservation Areas, not just forests. Photo Credit: WWF

More needs to happen…

However, in a letter addressed to PepsiCo CEO and chairman Indra Nooyi​ two months after the pledge, Sum Of Us said the company had to stop further development in High Conservation Areas (HCA), not just forests, and also implement independent verification audits on suppliers, rather than just relying on RSPO certification and membership.

Sum Of Us’ Thomas said PepsiCo had made some improvements since, but suggested these weren’t enough and it should follow in the footsteps of Kellogg, Dunkin’ Donuts and Krispy Kreme which had taken the lead in the past year. Kellogg revamped its palm oil policy in February, 2014​, following months of protests from a host of environmental agencies and consumer networks, including Sum Of Us. General Mills also revamped its palm oil policy to explicitly include efforts against deforestation​ in March, 2014.

Sum Of Us says focusing on a brand makes it easier for consumers to understand the impact
Sum Of Us says focusing on a brand makes it easier for consumers to understand the impact

“PepsiCo purchases 427,500 tons of palm oil a year, so yes, we believe that they could have a massive impact on the industry if they improved their palm oil policy.”

Asked why Sum Of Us had focused in on just one of Frito-Lay’s snack brands, she said: “We find that focusing on brands that have resonance with our members, increases the chance of the campaign getting exposure and being effective. Consumers may not know or understand how PepsiCo operates, or a palm oil trader or supplier, but chances are they’re very familiar with Doritos.”

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Donut Frying Insights

Donut Frying Insights

Cargill | 11-Sep-2019 | Technical / White Paper

What to know when selecting a donut frying shortening and
best practice tips for optimal frying performance

Related suppliers

2 comments

Correction on prevoius comment

Posted by Simon,

Only 18% of global supply is certified sustainable, of which, a mere 8% is physical palm oil, the rest being paper offsets. WRONG

18% of global production is certified under the RSPO standard (principles and criteria), the certification does not change depending on the supply chain used to sell it, physical oil is physical oil – still enters the global supply chain.

The CORRECT numbers 2014: 58.6 million tonnes of palm oil produced globally (oil world database January 2015) / of which 10.9 million tonnes of RSPO certified supply available = 18%.

Of the 18% or 10.9 million tonnes of supply, 5.3 million tonnes is sold as RSPO certified via the four supply chain options (remember a plantation could also hold ISCC certification), 48% of the available supply is sold as RSPO certified. Of that 5.3 million tonnes, 2.4 million tonnes (45%) is sold via IP/SG or MB, the remaining 2.9 million (55%) tonnes is via offsets.

Check them out for yourself http://www.rspo.org/about/impacts

Report abuse

Pepsico needs to show transparency and clarity

Posted by Robert Hii,

If Pepsico's public statements weren't so vague or confusing, it might have gotten the activists off their backs.

The full palm oil commitments linked to in this article states:
" majority of palm oil is produced sustainably" Wrong, only 18% of global supply is certified sustainable, of which, a mere 8% is physical palm oil, the rest being paper offsets.

Secondly, not all RSPO members produce certifed palm oil. Many RSPO members continue to work plantations that are NOT certified

As for their claim to use palm oil "confirmed to "have originated from responsible and sustainable sources by 2016", the only certified sustainable palm oil that will let them show this is the Segregated model from the RSPO. With that massive volume they use, it would mean they're heavy into discussions with suppliers to make it happen. If this is the case, it might be a good thing for Pepsico to share their progress publicly so that their consumers can rest assured that solid actions are being taken.

Report abuse

Follow us

Featured Events

View more

Products

View more

Webinars