Kellogg defends JV with Wilmar after illegal palm oil accusations

By Kacey Culliney

- Last updated on GMT

Kellogg defends accusations about its JV with Wilmar alleging illegal palm oil activity
Kellogg defends accusations about its JV with Wilmar alleging illegal palm oil activity

Related tags Palm oil

Kellogg says it takes palm oil sourcing extremely seriously and is defending its joint venture with Wilmar International after accusations that the Asian agri giant is involved in illegal palm oil activities.

A WWF report published on June 26 entitled ‘Palming Off a National Park: Tackling Illegal Oil Palm Fruit in Riau, Sumatra’​ alleged that Wilmar International has been trading illegally-grown palm oil in Indonesia. Findings in the report are based on an investigation conducted by WWF-Indonesia from February 2011 to April 2012.

The report has sparked consumer activist group Sum Of Us to launch a petition calling on Kellogg to cut ties and end its joint venture with Wilmar due to fears about the agri business' sustainability credentials.

The group raised concerns about Kellogg providing billions of dollars in business to Wilmar – a corporation that it claimed has sourced palm oil from natural parks and protected areas.

Chief sustainability officer at Kellogg Diane Holdorf defended its joint venture with Wilmar.

Speaking to, Holdorf said: “Kellogg recognizes and respects concerns about the sustainability of palm oil and has gone to great lengths to ensure we are doing our part on this important issue.”

“As part of our commitment with the Consumer Goods Forum to help achieve zero net deforestation by 2020, we have made aggressive changes to our sourcing of palm oil since 2011.”

“Today, all of the palm oil we use is 100% sustainably sourced through a combination of GreenPalm certificates, mass balance and segregated sustainably growth supply,”​ she said.

The RSPO said it has not been made aware of any foul play by its member Wilmar International
The RSPO said it has not been made aware of any foul play by its member Wilmar International

RSPO corporate membership

Kellogg only works with palm oil suppliers that are members of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), Holdorf said.  “Kellogg is also a corporate member of RSPO, working with this group and other stakeholders toward the development of a consistent and sufficient supply of segregated, sustainably grown palm oil that is economically viable, environmentally appropriate and socially beneficial.”

Established in 2004, the RSPO aims to promote the production and use of sustainable palm oil. Its members must abide by clear rules and certification schemes, part of which forbids the cultivation of palm oil trees in protected areas of forest.

Director of RSPO Indonesia, Desi Kusumadewi told this site that it had not been made aware of any foul play by its member Wilmar International. The agri business, she said, is working towards 100% RSPO certification on all its sites and subsidiaries and its with plantations in Indonesia are already certified.

“If there is evidence that any company is working illegally, it will be considered as non-compliant to RSPO standards,”​ she said. The RSPO will take action in any event of non-compliance, she added.

However, Sum Of Us campaign director Rob Wohl said there are “serious flaws with the RSPO” ​and called its standards “weak”​ .

“We don’t take Wilmar’s membership or its certifications terribly seriously,”​ he said.

Calls for Kellogg to push Wilmar on 100% deforestation-free palm oil 

Sum Of Us is targeting Kellogg because of its previous sustainability commitments
Sum Of Us is targeting Kellogg because of its previous sustainability commitments

Sum Of Us has called on Kellogg to exert “whatever pressure is needed”​ to force Wilmar to operate within the law and ideally adopt deforestation-free palm oil.

“Sourcing RSPO-certified palm oil is nice, but Kellogg’s (and really, all global corporations) need to be doing everything in their power to stop deforestation. Ideally, Kellogg should follow Nestlé’s lead by adopting strong deforestation-free principles and allow independent oversight of its supply chain,”​ Wohl said.

“We decided to target Kellogg’s in large part because of their past commitment to source sustainable palm oil. Now, their deal with Wilmar might not violate that letter of that commitment, but by passing billions of dollars’ worth of business to a company that’s complicit in the destruction of protected forests, we think it’s completely violating the spirit and the trust of consumers,”​ he said.

Since the WWF investigation and report, management at PR Citra Riau Sarana (an Indonesian Wilmar subsidiary) has written to WWF stating that it would stop purchasing FFB from plantations inside the Tesso Nilo National part, would not buy illegal FFB from any source and ensure firm agreements are made with FFB sellers to ensure legal sales. “However, WWF has not verified the implementation of these commitments at the mill level,”​ WWF-Indonesia said in the report. is in contact with the WWF and Wilmar International on this story, but neither had finalized responses prior to publication. More to follow…

Related topics Regulation & Safety

Related news

Show more


Look under the sauce to see if its pasta

Posted by DeforestationWatch,

Both Bakery and Snacks and Kelloggs should look under the sauce to see if it is really pasta.

A case of isolated non compliance by an independent supplier is made to look like systemic abuse of the supply chain!

These 2 decade long palm oil bashing campaigns have been exposed recently by Italian civil libertarian group to have been based on "manufactured and false evidence" and "funded by the European Commission (EC) in an effort to protect the EU's own indigenous edible oil industries such as rapeseed and sunflower oil who are hapless in facing the market onslaught of the hyper yielding and consequently, ultra price competitive palm oil! This is the self same EC which had sanctimoniously thrown the book at Microsoft and other corps. for violating the EU's competition laws!

Any objective observer would have noted that something does not jive with all the anti-palm oil hype!

After all palm oil is, intrinsically the most sustainable of all oilseed crops, which superyields that meant that palm oil required only 0.023% of the world's agricultural lands to roduce 30% of the world's supply of edible oil. However, it is this hyperyield that marks palm oil out as a target for these spurious campaigns by governments forced by their uncompetitive indigenous edible oilseed industries to fund protectionist measures disguised as environmental campaigns!

How can Bakery and Snacks fall for and lend its column inches to what is, ultimately, a blatant protectionist scheme?

Report abuse

Kellog defends it's relationship with Wilma

Posted by steven horton,

I respect Wilma. The company has a code of ethics and conduct that reaches the highest levels of mankind. The company you can not find a fault with.
Whereas the employees are all responsible for what they do and how they as individuals make money and get paid their bonus. Oil which every one knows is a commodity.
It gets made and transported to the nearest collection point. The oil gets collected and mixed with other oils that have also come from many destinations. After all - it now becomes an amorphous product. The accusations of the WWF are difficult to agree with. The question really is - is 100% of the oil source (that the WWF is talking of) an oil from the forests being the home of the tiger- I doubt it ....but whose to know?

Report abuse