Breaking News on Industrial Baking & Snacks

Big Brands > Kellogg

Case against Kellogg’s trans-fat cookies crumbles

Post a comment
Gill Hyslop

By Gill Hyslop+


The case against Kellogg's trans fat-containing cookies has been dismissed by a US judge as preempted by federal law. Pic: ©iStock/urfinguss
The case against Kellogg's trans fat-containing cookies has been dismissed by a US judge as preempted by federal law. Pic: ©iStock/urfinguss

‘Frivolous’ is how a California federal judge described a proposed class action targeting the use of partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs) in Kellogg’s cookies.

The case, Shavonda Hawkins v. Kellogg Co., was dismissed by US district judge John Houston, as it was also recorded to have been preempted by federal law.

Hawkins’ suit claimed Kellogg has violated both California’s Unfair Competition Law and the US Food Drug and Cosmetic Act by using the purportedly toxic food additive in its cookies to boost profits rather than a safer alternative.

Jumping the gun

Judge Houston ruled that the current use of PHOs in food products does not violate federal law as manufacturers have been given a deadline of June 2018 to remove it from their foods.

In June 2015, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported that partially hydrogenated oil was no longer deemed safe to include in foods.

Evidence was found that links PHOs and the artificial trans fats they contain to coronary heart disease.

The FDA ruled that food companies must remove the PHOs from their foods, giving them a three-year transitionary period to find substitutes to minimize market disruptions.

The plaintiff also alleged she faces a higher risk of developing several serious diseases from eating Kellogg’s Mother Cookies, which contain partially hydrogenated oil.

The firing line

The suit against Kellogg is yet another in a long line of proposed class actions aimed at food manufacturers, including Nestlé and General Mills, over the use of PHOs.

It is also not the first time that Hawkins has sued a company for using PHOs, supposedly to boost profits, rather than a suitable alternative. In 2015, she launched a similar suit against AdvancePierre Foods over its use of PHOs in its microwaveable Fast Bites sandwiches.

When approached by BakeryAndSnacks, Kellogg responded that, as a matter of policy, it does not comment on litigation.

In 2016, US president Barak Obama signed the Consolidated Appropriations Action, which, said Judge Houston, is also meant to prevent trivial lawsuits.

“The court finds that plaintiff’s current action is one of the ‘frivolous’ suits that congress meant to preclude until 2018,” he ruled.

Post a comment

Comment title *
Your comment *
Your name *
Your email *

We will not publish your email on the site

I agree to Terms and Conditions

These comments have not been moderated. You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment. Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments. If you wish to complain about a comment please use the "REPORT ABUSE" button or contact the editors.

Key Industry Events


Access all events listing

Our events, Shows & Conferences...