Gene-edited wheat delivers a dough performance upgrade

Scientist examining wheat grains in petri dishes
Scientists have created stronger wheat with fewer gluten risks. (Getty Images)

A surprise win for bakers: by deleting the most toxic gluten peptides, researchers have made wheat safer for the gluten-sensitive – and stronger for high-performance dough

Key insights:

  • Deleting toxic peptides makes gluten stronger.
  • Δgli-D2 cuts the need for additives.
  • It’s a big step toward safer wheat.

A scientific breakthrough designed to reduce wheat’s celiac-triggering proteins has unexpectedly handed bakers a gift: stronger, stretchier gluten.

In a new study published in the April 8, 2025 edition of Theoretical and Applied Genetics, researchers deleted a set of harmful α-gliadin genes from wheat’s D genome and discovered the resulting flour not only contained fewer toxic peptides but also delivered better breadmaking performance.

For the bakery industry, this is more than just a scientific milestone – it’s a potential gamechanger. It opens the door to cleaner-label loaves, fewer additives in formulations and access to the gluten-sensitive consumer market without sacrificing rise, structure or flavor. For anyone who’s struggled with gluten-free baking or wrestled with the compromises of ‘better-for-you’ bread, this news might sound almost too good to be true.

But here’s the twist: the goal wasn’t to create a superflour for bakers. The research was aimed at reducing the immune-reactive proteins that make wheat a dietary danger zone for people with celiac disease. The stronger gluten? That was a surprise bonus. And it’s the kind of unexpected win that could have ripple effects across every corner of the baking world.

Imagine stronger dough that doesn’t rely on additives like vital wheat gluten or oxidizers to achieve peak performance. Picture loaves with beautiful structure and open crumb but built from a flour that’s less likely to trigger gluten sensitivities. That’s what this new wheat could offer. And it all starts with a strategic deletion on a single chromosome.

A scientific fix that strengthens gluten

Woman cook stretches yeast dough, sourdough for bread
Gluten is the stretch that gives dough structure and bread character. (Credit/Getty Images)

The breakthrough came when researchers deleted a stretch of wheat’s DNA, known as Δgli-D2, which carries a set of α-gliadin genes. These genes produce proteins - including the well-known 33-mer fragment - that are closely tied to triggering immune responses in people with celiac disease.

With that section removed, the wheat lost a significant portion of its most reactive peptides - researchers estimate around 81% of the key immune-activating sequences were eliminated. That was the original goal. But what surprised the scientists - and should excite bakers - was this deletion also improved gluten strength.


Also read → Major breakthrough: Scientists finalize billion-piece jigsaw puzzle by cracking modern bread wheat code

The explanation lies in gluten chemistry. The α-gliadins on chromosome 6D contain 7-cysteine variants that act as ‘chain terminators’, limiting the growth of glutenin polymers. Once those disruptive proteins were taken out of the equation, the gluten structure was able to develop more freely - resulting in longer strands, better stretch and improved gas retention. In the bakery, that translates to taller loaves and springier crumb, with less reliance on added gluten, oxidizers or other performance boosters.

What’s more, early testing showed these benefits came without any trade-offs in grain yield, protein levels or overall flour quality. For industrial bakers, this could mean improved process tolerance and simplified formulations. Artisan bakers might see more consistent open crumb structures and enhanced dough handling. Across the board, there’s potential for cleaner-label claims without sacrificing product performance.

Millers and flour brands could also position this wheat as part of a new generation of flours aimed at the health-conscious and gluten-aware consumer - an especially valuable segment given growing demand for functional and free-from options.

Still not ‘celiac-safe’ but getting closer

Group of people looking at baked goods in bakery window
This breakthrough could make a big difference for people with gluten sensitivity or wheat intolerance. (Jens Lucking/Getty Images)

It’s important to be clear: on its own, the Δgli-D2 deletion doesn’t make wheat completely safe for people with celiac disease. While it removes some of the most reactive sequences, other problematic peptides are still present - particularly in the A and B genomes, and in other gluten components like low- and high-molecular-weight glutenins.

That said, the study also explored pairing Δgli-D2 with another deletion on the A genome (Δgli-A2), which brought the overall levels of immunogenic peptides down even further - without affecting how the wheat performs in baking. Researchers are now looking at ways to go further, whether through stacking more deletions or using precision tools like CRISPR to remove what’s left.


Also read → Dutch scientists have cracked the gene code to make ‘gluten-safe’ wheat

The ultimate goal is a wheat variety that’s genuinely celiac-safe, but that will require human trials before it’s ready for real-world use. Until then, a strict gluten-free diet remains essential for those with celiac disease. Even so, this breakthrough could still make a big difference for people with gluten sensitivity or wheat intolerance who don’t have a formal diagnosis.

A win-win for the industry

Happy supermarket baker serving male customer
This discovery is more than a breakthrough - it’s a turning point for clean-label innovation. (drazen_zigic/Getty Images)

This discovery marks a rare moment when a public health innovation intersects with a functional upgrade.

While the original intent was to make wheat safer for consumption, the serendipitous side effect - stronger gluten - makes this development especially compelling for the baking sector.

The potential impact is significant. This wheat could allow bakeries to introduce ‘low-gluten’ or ‘gluten-reduced’ options that still deliver the taste and texture of classic wheat bread. It might also ease cross-contamination worries in mixed production facilities and give bakers more freedom to experiment with high-hydration or clean-label recipes - without worrying about dough strength.

Plus, because this wheat was developed through gamma radiation - a long-standing, non-GMO breeding method - it may face fewer regulatory hurdles in markets that are cautious about genetic modification.

Researchers are now focused on stacking additional deletions and refining CRISPR-based edits to remove remaining toxic sequences. Field trials and human studies will determine whether these modified wheats can truly be tolerated by those with celiac disease. In parallel, breeders and millers will need to assess agronomic performance and flour consistency at scale.

It may be years before ‘celiac-safe’ wheat reaches grocery shelves. But Δgli-D2 wheat – with its unique combination of safer profile and enhanced dough strength – could enter commercial baking circles much sooner.

From lab to loaf

Scientists removed a section of wheat’s chromosome 6D (Δgli-D2), cutting out 81% of the peptides known to trigger celiac disease.

The same deletion unexpectedly strengthens gluten, improving elasticity and bread volume.

Dough made from Δgli-D2 wheat performs better – without needing vital wheat gluten or emulsifiers.

While not yet safe for people with celiac disease, it shows real promise for gluten-sensitive consumers.

Stacking deletions or using CRISPR could soon deliver flour that’s both high-performance and celiac-safe.

With this breakthrough, the industry no longer has to choose between safer wheat and better bread. For the first time, it may be possible to have both.

Study:

Rottersman, M.G., Zhang, W., Zhang, J. et al. Deletion of wheat alpha-gliadins from chromosome 6D improves gluten strength and reduces immunodominant celiac disease epitopes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics (2025) 138, 94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-025-04882-3