General Mills must face lawsuit over Cheerios Protein marketing

By Douglas Yu contact

- Last updated on GMT

Cheerios Protein name is 'misleading', claim plaintiffs in court case
Cheerios Protein name is 'misleading', claim plaintiffs in court case

Related tags: Cheerios protein, President of the united states, General mills

General Mills must face a lawsuit claiming the company misled consumers by marketing Cheerios Protein as a higher-protein alternative to regular Cheerios, a US federal judge has ruled.

The cereals manufacturer had brought a motion at the US district court, northern district of California, to dismiss a case filed by the DC-based Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) last November on the behalf of consumers in California and New York.

The plaintiffs claim the name Cheerios Protein is misleading as it implies that the product is essentially the same as Cheerios, only with added protein.

While a 'serving' of Cheerios Protein has more protein than regular Cheerios (7 g per serving versus 3 g per serving), the plaintiffs say the amount of additional protein is not material as the suggested serving serving size and calories per serving of Cheerios Protein is considerably larger than that of regular Cheerios. They point out that, based on the brands' Nutrition Facts panels, 200 calories of Cheerios contains 6 g of protein, while 200 calories of Cheerios Protein contains 6.4 g or 6.7 g of protein, depending on the flavor.

Cheerios Protein - 17 g of sugar

They also argued that Cheerios Protein has about 17 g of sugar compared to 1 g in the original Cheerios, and that the Cheerios Protein name is misleading because it says nothing about added sugar.

Dismissing General Mills' motion, judge Thelton Henderson ruled that, although “skeptical,”​ he felt it was possible for the plaintiffs “to prove that a reasonable consumer was likely to be deceived".

'Fuel Up' ad not misleading

The court did, however, grant a motion by General Mills to dismiss a claim that advertising for Cheerios Protein using the slogan 'Fuel Up' - featuring a NASCAR driver picking up a child and racing him to school - was misleading. 

Judge Henderson ruled the 'Fuel Up' claim was too general to constitute an actionable statement, and that “a reasonable consumer would not interpret the statement as a reliably factual claim​".

When approached by BakeryandSnacks, General Mills said it does not comment on pending litigation.

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

We offer even more reason to indulge.

We offer even more reason to indulge.

ADM | 22-Sep-2022 | Insight Guide

Consumers want snacks that are both delicious and nutritious. That’s why we incorporate more fiber and plant-based choices and use ingredients like botanical...

Food ingredients from Cambridge Commodities

Food ingredients from Cambridge Commodities

Cambridge Commodities | 01-Sep-2022 | Product Brochure

At Cambridge Commodities, we supply a variety of food ingredients for inclusion in bakery products, cereal, snacks, bars and more. We can also offer bespoke...

Bakery Boom: Reinvention invites smart indulgence

Bakery Boom: Reinvention invites smart indulgence

Cargill | 23-Aug-2022 | Technical / White Paper

While bakery products may be the ultimate comfort food, concerns about sugar and carbohydrate content have led many consumers to feel torn about their...

Related suppliers

Follow us

Products

View more

Webinars