SUBSCRIBE

Breaking News on Industrial Baking & Snacks

Read more breaking news

 

 

Kellogg and General Mills defend themselves against January anti-GMO campaign

7 commentsBy Kacey Culliney , 23-Jan-2013
Last updated on 23-Jan-2013 at 16:02 GMT

Cereal giants Kellogg and General Mills have both defended the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in their breakfast cereals in response to a January anti-GMO campaign against them.

Anti-GMO campaign coalition GMO Inside has launched a fresh campaign for 2013 and for the month of January will be focused on Kellogg’s and General Mills.

“Putting Kellogg’s and General Mills under our January spotlight is part of GMO Inside’s commitment to educate consumers about which products are likely to have GMO ingredients. We’ll call attention to new products every month,” Elizabeth O’Connell, campaign director at GMO Inside, said.

The campaign has called on both companies to either label GMO ingredients or remove them.

GMOs are safe and can help feed the world, says Kellogg

Kris Charles, spokesperson for The Kellogg Company defended its use of GMOs.

“Leading health organizations worldwide have concluded that GMOs are safe. They require fewer pesticides, provide improved nutrition and, with increased yields, will help feed the world’s every-increasing population,” Charles told BakeryandSnacks.com.

“We continue to actively monitor the science, regulations and our consumers’ preferences on this topic,” he continued.

He said that Kellogg’s Kashi brand offers a variety of Non-GMO Project Verified options for those US consumers looking for an alternative.

Kellogg's Kashi brand did face a lawsuit back in 2011 against its 'all natural' claims and its cereal brand was a topic of conversation back in April 2012 after products were pulled from a grocery store in Portsmouth after genetically modified (GM) ingredients were identified.

Following this, Kellogg had seven Kashi cereal products verified as non-GMO under the Non-GMO Project. 

GMO labeling calls

In November last year, California’s Proposition 37 (Prop 37) received a 'No' vote after it called on companies to disclose foods sold in the state that were ‘genetically engineered’ (for raw agricultural commodities) or ‘may have been entirely or partially produced with genetic engineering’ (for processed foods or supplements).

Supporters claimed that consumers have a right to know what is in their food but opponents argued it would lead to a tidal wave of frivolous lawsuits and raise grocery bills without providing any health or safety benefits.

Responding to the latest anti-GMO campaign in an emailed statement, General Mills said: “We have long opposed state-by-state labeling, as we openly and transparently explained on our website months ago. We were not alone in taking that position. Most of the food industry opposed Prop 37 for the same reasons.”

“Some of those unhappy with Proposition 37’s defeat are now targeting companies that opposed it. But we remain opposed to state-by-state labeling, for the reasons we’ve explained,” it continued.

Anti-GMO gains momentum

Despite the ‘No’ vote on Prop 37, food ingredients marketing group the Scoular Group told our sister site FoodNavigator-USA last year at Supply Side West that the momentum behind sourcing non-GMO ingredients remains as strong as ever, with non-GMO Project verified sales up 66%. This, it said, was driven by consumers looking for a choice of non-GMO products or labeled GMO content.

7 comments (Comments are now closed)

Feed Grade for Animals?

Allen Crider, why is it necessary to even consider GMOs an option for animal feed, when people eat animals? Also, technically humans are considered part of the Animal Kingdom. We are warm-blooded mammals with highly evolved brains, but that doesn't make other animals any less deserving of eating "real" food.

Report abuse

Posted by Lyra Batschild
26 January 2013 | 05h36

Sure They're Safe?

Jeremiah Cornelius writes "Researchers with the European Food Safety Authority discovered variants of the Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S in the most widely harvested varieties of genetically-modified crops, including Monsanto's RoundupReady Soy and Maze. According to the researchers, Podevin and du Jardin, the particular 'Gene VI' is responsible for a number of possible consequences that could affect human health, including inhibition of RNA silencing and production of proteins with known toxicity. The EFSA is endorsing 'retrospective risk assessment' of CaMV promoter and its Gene VI sequences — in an attempt to give it a clean bill of health. It is unknown if the presence of the hidden viral genes were the result of laboratory contamination or a possible recombinant product of the resultant organism. There are serious implications for the production of GMO for foodstuffs, given either possibility."

People are waking up to the reality and no longer have a blind trust in corporations or our government. Kellogg's response is just a repeat of the BS that the biotech companies put out. Guess who conducts the safety testing? Exactly.

Report abuse

Posted by Sarah Beans
25 January 2013 | 22h13

Doctors are finding a link to weight gain, and many problems

Sadly, we cannot believe all that we read, but several books have been written by Dr.s, that have found that there is a link to gmo grains, and.... WEIGHT gain. For most starving people, this would be good news,for some of us, it is NOT. Also, if your own body rejects food, even if it has been proven to be healthy, you are forced to seek other options. Been there, done that.

Report abuse

Posted by mk
25 January 2013 | 22h00

Read all comments (7)

Key Industry Events

 

Access all events listing

Our events, Events from partners...